On Page 149 o f Dynamics of Time and Space” there appears one of those mind-bending TSK expressions :<\/p>\n
“Operating before each measured-out move, prior to directionality, \u00c2\u00a0 it is the not-not-not.”<\/p>\n
Is it possible to understand, is it possible to embody, join, exemplify, appreciate \u00c2\u00a0 . . . \u00c2\u00a0?<\/p>\n
——————–<\/p>\n
A: Not, Not<\/p>\n
B: Who’s there?<\/p>\n
A: Not, Not, Not<\/p>\n
B: I don’t see anyone. \u00c2\u00a0 Does someone want to come in?<\/p>\n
A: I’m already in.<\/p>\n
B: Then why did you not not on the door?<\/p>\n
A: I did not not not on the door.<\/p>\n
B: You’re saying that you didn’t not not on the door?<\/p>\n
A: It seems that you want to identity a not who not not-ed on the door. \u00c2\u00a0But the door was already open.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
On Page 149 o f Dynamics of Time and Space” there appears one of those mind-bending TSK expressions : “Operating before each measured-out move, prior to directionality, \u00c2\u00a0 it is the not-not-not.” Is it possible to understand, is it possible … Continue reading