First I\u00c2\u00b4ve got the problem with numbering: what can I identify with A, what is B?<\/p>\n
Slowly but alert, my perceiption becomes finer and in same time faded. And on the “smaler” scale, which come into being by itself, there are much more moments,like this: A-A1-A2a-b-d–A3a,b——A4; as if opens an uge space, and it becomes appearent, that my ability for perceiption is quite lame (slowly). Or not quick enough for the speed of these moments, to discriminate them more clear. I wished, I could slow down the speed, like with an old film-projector.<\/p>\n
I tried to start again and again this \u00c2\u00b4line of movements\u00c2\u00b4like in the diagram and I thought, my continuing process runs not along a line, more as a string, in bends and turns, nowhere strait. My question here: does time flows in a line!? My experience is more like a dynamic chaos. And a kind of line, or sequential form, I thought again, one picture, idea, intention emerged after the previous. How in old slide-projector, you must pull out the previous slide and than you can push-in the next dia.<\/p>\n
On p. 109, at the beginning: it makes immediatly sense, that the consequence is – a continuing isolation from direct experience. But I couldn\u00c2\u00b4t distinguish “descriptive knowledge” from “pola knowledge”. And also I understand the remark of you, Jack, that the move toward description adds a layer onto the experience( in your indroduction). Even I describe the process of polar knowledge, it is a descriptive knowledge?<\/p>\n
I\u00c2\u00b4ll have a look onto the posts of this week.<\/p>\n
Arthur<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
First I\u00c2\u00b4ve got the problem with numbering: what can I identify with A, what is B? Slowly but alert, my perceiption becomes finer and in same time faded. And on the “smaler” scale, which come into being by itself, there … Continue reading