<\/p>\n
I had a lovely experience after the phone session the other night (Sydney time). I went back to bed, with the hope of falling asleep. However, the conversation had naturally stimulated me, and I didn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t fall asleep immediately. So instead I decided to attune to the field communiqu\u00c3\u00a9, to continue (in silence) the conversation with you wonderful folk, there in the \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcgiven-as-it-unfolds.\u00e2\u20ac\u2122<\/p>\n
As a result, I believe, \u00c2\u00a0of the things we had raised in the phone session, as I was enjoying opening to the fullness of the field, the thing that came into sharp relief was the issue of \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcthe reality\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 of the perceptible. I could accept anything perceived as \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcsomething\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 communicated, but I couldn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t ascribe anything but a provisional reality to anything so communicated.<\/p>\n
I decided , then, that I didn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t need to find anything real; that such a wish seemed to be superfluous to the communiqu\u00c3\u00a9. I returned to simply attuning to the unfolding presence of unarticulated meaningfulness, and then suddenly I slipped into a peace that communicated a realness un-associated with thing-perceptions. A big thank you to all for being.<\/p>\n
Christopher.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
I had a lovely experience after the phone session the other night (Sydney time). I went back to bed, with the hope of falling asleep. However, the conversation had naturally stimulated me, and I didn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t fall asleep immediately. So instead … Continue reading