Sometimes the TSK texts seem to be asking us to shrink our world: flattening three-dimensional space; the suggestion that separation and distance are not real attributes of appearance; the suggestion that a single appearance can fill all of Space.\u00c2\u00a0 At first glance, it seems we are being asked to reduce the fullness of our usual multiple entities and parsed out reality.\u00c2\u00a0 But gradually it sinks in that this busyness is not fullness or wholeness: when we see fragments, separation, parts, we are failing to see a unitary space with\u00c2\u00a0its corresponding Body of\u00c2\u00a0Knowledge.\u00c2\u00a0 It’s not that Space and Knowledge are too limited to accommodate multiplicty.\u00c2\u00a0 It’s that multiplicity is not fundamentally at the core.\u00c2\u00a0 Perhaps with every appearance we are looking through\u00c2\u00a0one of the many windows through which we can glimpse a vastness\u00c2\u00a0that is intrinsically unbroken.\u00c2\u00a0 –Michael<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Sometimes the TSK texts seem to be asking us to shrink our world: flattening three-dimensional space; the suggestion that separation and distance are not real attributes of appearance; the suggestion that a single appearance can fill all of Space.\u00c2\u00a0 At … Continue reading