There’s\u00c2\u00a0a sentence in this week’s reading (middle of Page 87), “The ever unfolding sequences move toward increasing dimensionalization: the multiple pronouncing of what has been recorded.”\u00c2\u00a0 This reminds me of another sentence, in the previous unit, where we studied how we lose touch with Space by projecting substance: (page 55) ” . . . subtance proliferates, and the transitional construction of multidimensional appearance gives way to a reality that has already been established.”\u00c2\u00a0 I wonder if we are now beginning to look at a parallel process in how we set up a “happeneded” world in time.\u00c2\u00a0 In both cases, we seem to project established images onto a realm that is thereby prevented from making itself known.\u00c2\u00a0 This recognition perhaps holds out some promice: since becoming aware of the tendency to project substance onto the openness of space has helped loosen that tendency, I can hope that by becoming aware of how I am investing my future with replicas of the past (the happeneded) I may become able to look differently for\u00c2\u00a0the fresh possibilities allowed by time.\u00c2\u00a0 –Michael<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
There’s\u00c2\u00a0a sentence in this week’s reading (middle of Page 87), “The ever unfolding sequences move toward increasing dimensionalization: the multiple pronouncing of what has been recorded.”\u00c2\u00a0 This reminds me of another sentence, in the previous unit, where we studied how … Continue reading