Author Archives: Jack

Hi all, We had a great pre-program phone call this past Sunday, which should be posted online soon. My notes here overlap considerably with what I had to say there. The first lines of the DTS reading for this week … Continue reading →

Erin, I like your examples from music and art. They help make the point. But it is still important to try to instantiate the point. For instance, what would it be like to interact with someone in a ‘relaxed vibrato’ … Continue reading →

David’s description of the exercise we did during the phone call (2 calls back) is not quite how I had meant to present it, but you can listen to the phone call yourself and decide. But his description of his … Continue reading →

It’s nice to see a very active week of posts. I especially encourage everyone to respond to posts by others. And also to post something about yourself in the “Meet the Participants” section, as Erin did this past week. I’m … Continue reading →

David, as always you have a lovely way of expressing yourself. You raise an interesting question. Isn’t ‘expanding’ a kind of manipulation, which therefore takes us away from the experience itself? It is if it goes in the direction you … Continue reading →

Bruce, I like the first paragraph of your post about walking in the October weather very much as a description of what happens when you go to the non-content level of experience. Sometimes I encourage people to shift the center … Continue reading →

It’s been a busy week, and I haven’t had a chance to review all that’s been posted till now (including a few posts at the end of last week.) I also did not present the exercises in the guidance section, … Continue reading →

Hi all, We had some technical difficulties with the conference call today, so at the end I decided not to introduce the exercise(s) for the week in the call, as I had been planning, but to post them here instead. … Continue reading →

This is a comment to Louise’s post, called “overall comment.” (Louise, I moved it into the “TSK Online Fall 2008” category, which may be an answer to one of the questions you raise. Also, I signed your name for you: … Continue reading →