State Specific Knowing

Jack has been helpful over the past few weeks in guiding us in deconstructing the validity of the conventional constructs.

I was therefore able to consider more fully the exercises implied.

I found that self and the world it inhabits is state specific. When I am tired or hungry I feel a certain way and the situation in which I exist looks a certain way. My view of myself and of the world is influenced by my state of body-mind. Whether I am angry or sad, fearful or safe all influence my perception of an external and my experience of an internal.

A sense of reality accompanies each state knowing. When I am dreaming the self and its experiences all seem real. When I am angry my perception of my circumstance seems so real that I can justify my anger and reinforce the sense of myself.

Hayward

About Hayward

Clinical Psychologist and practicing psychotherapist for thirty seven years. Studying Time Space and Knowledge since 1980 and integrating this vision into clinical practice as seemingly appropriate and useful.
This entry was posted in uncatagorized, TSK Online Program 2009-2010. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to State Specific Knowing

  1. Hayward says:

    Morning Michael
    I was sloppy with my written word. What I meant to convey was the perception (or experience) of self and world are state specific.It is only through perception that we experience or know anything and this knowing is state specific.

    In the example you give of the ticking clock during meditation, we might remember how annoying that sound might be during a sleepless night, or how slowly time seems to pass when we are in pain. It seems every state of body-mind carries its own sense of what is real about the self and what is real about its circumstance.

    One of the traps in which we frequently find our self is our tendency to explain how we feel in terms of what we perceive external events to be. This tendency ignores that the perception of the event, the meaning we ascribe to it and our emotional reaction to the ascribed meaning are all a unit and all state dependent.

    Thanks for the dialogue

  2. michaelg says:

    Hi Hayward. In your post you make several references to self and world, suggesting that both are conditioned by the same influences. I’ have been wondering if they are different on some level (or not), in the course of doing the exercise for Chapter 23 (“Observing Without Owning”). The oscillations between events, which appear to be occuring outside me (the tick/tock of the clock, a car passing), feels different from the thoughts that arise (I have ten minutes before the timer goes off, how will I best use it?”) Perhaps those thoughts are driven by influences of which I know nothing and are therefore pretty much events external to the self, but Itheyfeel different. I guess I imagine I could steer my thoughts, but not the clock? –Michael

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *