“By being ready to take each question to a deeper level, it dissolves or transforms each structure in turn, so that in the end there are no obstacles to the recognition of knowledge at work.†– Tarthang Tulku LOK, 273
Last night a strong desire came and I had the opportunity to practice Jack’s invitation to enter emotionality differently. I felt into the desire directly, knowing it from inside it. The desire expanded. This intimate way of inquiring/knowing the desire brought a reaction: it was a sense of dying. “Okay, so this is next…†I became curious: What’s this? I entered it, coming up the inside of it with space and playfulness. I felt into the dying. I, in a manner of speaking, became the dying.
I faintly discerned it had to do with a loss of ‘selfhood.’ Dropping into another layer of it all, I found the ‘self’ was rejecting the original inquiry – sullenly resisting opening to the original desire, and so I next entered into the resistance with the same curious spaciousness.
Soon I noticed that there was something to do with my mother which had arisen, and entering that I found (to my surprise) that there was resistance to having no structure, because that would mean the loss of some structured ‘good me’. I could see my self-structure was built around being ‘good’ (and so letting the original desire be conscious was threatening to my ego-structure.)  There was a belief there that I had to be good for my mother. So, next I let that be here, and again – entered it intimately as ‘space presenting to space,’ I trusted not-knowing as the ground of fidelity to ‘what-is.’
It dropped down another layer. I saw that the self- structure thought that I NEED the good-bad polarity, for my existence. I saw my whole life as a dharma practitioner there – taking on the dharma as a way to be good (for an internalised mother). This dissolved the structure. I stayed with no structure for a while, curious, and again entering the sense of emptiness from inside it. Next I experienced the mind desiring another step. I realised that it believed that another step must come. But that was a kind of a serial-jump. (That is, if I’ve had one layer after another, then I must have another, so I create the next step by expecting it.) So, I didn’t jump and I stayed put for what was presenting. Then I saw that I am not anything that appears or presents itself. This was evident from the mist-like insubstantial presentation of my bodily sensations. They were luminosity presenting as activity. But whatever they were, I wasn’t in them, nor was ‘I’ established  ‘by’ them. There was a total darkness which was also a peaceful knowing.
That’s enough for now.
Christopher.
Thank you, Christopher; this was quite beautiful — clearly written and a wonderful description of the deep ‘excavation’ your openness to questioning allowed.
Bruce
Great description!
David
Great description!
David
Dear Christopher:
Wow is right. How kind of you to go through the trouble and the effort to express to such an amazing clairity and detail your experience. I apprecite it and it encourages me to bring the teachings to myordinary experiences too.
Thank you,
Soudabeh
Wow.