The dilemma: “We are limited by only what the self can know” is the consequence of knowing lower space and time in operation and can not be resolved (dissolved) in the terms in which it is presented.
It could be considered that knowledge is both transcendent and ordinary, appearing in and as the familiar.
We could remember that the self, ordinary experience and appearance is allowed by knowledge that is not limited to or defined by the form it assumes or expresses. “We” do not limit knowledge, we and all known are living expressions and evidence of Knowledge’s Presence.
Who could know such a way? :@)
Hayward
