Reading this week’s chapter in Love of Knowledge again, a thought occurred to me. The situation described–where there is a self, arbitrarily in charge, favoring a kind of knowledge guaranteed never to challenge it’s claim to be in charge, while also dedicating all it’s activities to satisfying that self’s wants–perhaps masks another, more fundamental kind of hiddeness. The hiddeness experienced in the meditation practice of “Watching the Watcher”, for instance. Perhaps part of what we call the self would remain hidden even if we succeeded in expanding technological knowledge with elements of self observation. What might improve would be the depth of the disconnect between the supposed purity of “objective” knowledge, and the supposed irrelevance of how we use its results. –Michael
Categories
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- David Filippone on A Change of Heart
- David Filippone on Giving Thoughts and Feelings Their Rightful Place
- Ken McKeon on Giving Thoughts and Feelings Their Rightful Place
- David Filippone on KNOWING NOT-KNOWING…
- Ken McKeon on KNOWING NOT-KNOWING…
Search Site
Aliveness arising art awareness being caring education embodiment emotion expanding experience field field communique Future Higher Knowing imagination inquiry intimacy knowledge language levels Light memory music nature not knowing opening poetry presence process ripples self senses space Stories thought time transcendence tsk Unknown vision Walkabouts witness zero zero(less)