Bruce’s Post says he did not really touch a special ‘knowing’ not tied to the self. It would be interesting to hear from others on this.
My best sense of this right now is that past and future can be accessible in a non-linear way. As Bruce rights, you can’t really hold on to the past and the future, in the same way we rather effortless hold on to the present (or at least feel we do). So if we give up that holding, what happens then? Bruce’s question at the end–what if there is no direct causal link–may be related to this question.
Jack