Peter asks, “What can I do that is different from stories?” That is definitely a question for DTS, which sees stories as all-pervasive.
 His first story (!) suggests a time that is outside of stories. There is an important distinction here between the story he is telling us now and the story he experienced. The fact is, as DTS suggests, that we almost always frame our experience in terms of a lived story, whether we tell that story to someone else or not.
Peter wonders whether this example shows what it is like to turn inward, to know time inwardly. Perhaps the answer depends on what was going on in that moment. Sometimes it is easier to know time in the presence of others. Perhaps that is what happened here.
 The second story (the irregular heartbeat) is cryptic. Does time, expressed in the physical, embody here a kind of knowledge?
 The third story is a question: does learning (to use a screwdriver, for example) obstruct TSK by creating a story?
I don’t think so. In the beginning when you learn, it is often a mechanical kind of learning, and this amounts to denying lived time. But then as you learn, the behavior you have learned enters your body and mind and becomes part of you, and this is a way of evoking the dynamic of time. And if you go into this dynamic, this conducting, the dynamic can also display knowingness.
Those are my thoughts.
Jack
Â