How beautiful this can be: fields of feeling and fields of knowing can be entire space fields in themselves to bask in as Space. This helps bring the experience of space as a field into my embodiment. Yet, the question keeps arising, ‘what is it like to be space, for space to be all that is needed?’ My mind keeps clamoring for content; how can I subsist, or even thrive, on no content – just Space? Wow, then who am I? Am I so deeply wrapped up in the maze of content that I have lost contact with the ‘source’ of the content, the essence of my being?
It feels that Space and Knowledge are not truly distinct from each other. Is Knowledge, or knowingness, then, the ‘content’ I seek comfort in, and that is inherent in Space? Space Knowledge. Fields of feeling are Space Knowledge. Can I surrender to Space being enough? – the inherent Space Knowledge of space. Certainly it is enough. How could it not be? If so, I sense the lightness and beauty that it offers.
John,
All things are space, time and knowledge. The meanings in the sense of “this means that” constitute first-level time.
We relegate “time” to the status of a stable background within wich objects and identities are preserved intact, and propositions and interpretations mean something. Identities and meanings all depend on a referring process, a subtle tendency to ground something by placing it in a wider and more general context. TSK 194
But we can go deeper and drop the tendency to ” refer to something”, and see that meaning do not depend only on words, and that the feel of the field allow another “kind” of meaning.