During this week I’ve been reviewing my relationship, and feel an active symbiotic connection between space and my field communiqué (FC). And within all this without doubt, it is me, who chooses how I’d like to manipulate the incoming transmissions. So the habit of our FC having a tendency to repetitively communicate identical reactions can I’ve found, be a win-win scenario, given all my explorations this week. Two of my experiences –
I live in a city where the traffic has a mind of its own, and cycling to and from work each day I never know in advance how many challenges are going to cross my path. But because of my pre programmed FC that acts like an early warning system (as well as efficiently storing new data when I see / experience near misses), and as long as I’m attentive to this (which I am!) there’s no reason / danger that anything untoward will occur that couldn’t normally happen. So I’m extremely glad to have this fully operational built-in advantage.
Conversely yesterday when I caught my FC characteristically reacting yet again to being irritated with my 9 year old computer, that takes ages to boot up and thinking it a useless heap and wanting to bin it and go buy a better one – the choice was there. Throw it out and pop over to Computer World for a new one that would whiz faster than I can type, or defrag my current one and remove all the SpyWare that’s insidiously crept onto it.
This all sounds very long winded when writing and relaying, but I’m finding my FC is a constant (even when dreaming, though it behaves in a more fluid way……), and its a very handy asset to have around.
Louise.
As a post note
For me the wonder of my FC is its inherent ability to differentiate (re wk 6 Skype session – How would we feel different between what is real but only have a media experience of it, and a TV programme based on reality?). Living in England the only experience I had re the recent US presidential election etc was solely through the media. But here again my FC with its pre-conceptions of reality and fiction can automatically discriminate between the recent election and (for want of a better example) ‘West Wing’ (? Don’t think I watch enough TV to know if this helps as I only know West Wing from people at work). And even though there will be commendable attributes within fiction which I aspire to and feel inspired by, I see it as a matter of objectivity. Imagination can be stretched between reality and fantasy (as I’ve previously engaged in), and that on returning from fantasy realities realness can be expanded (and condensed) without having to distort (alter) its originality.
PS: Although my generic processing is the same for everybody/mind, I don’t think it’s correct to project things onto others, hence me referring to myself.
Louise